Terug naar nieuws
World Cup 2026: Should Ghana have been awarded a penalty against England?
Teams 24 juni 2026

World Cup 2026: Should Ghana have been awarded a penalty against England?

In the World Cup match between England and Ghana in Group L, there was a commotion surrounding an intervention by Ezri Konsa on Prince Adu. Was it penalty worthy? We apply the assessment criteria without claiming the final verdict.

In the 2026 World Cup Group L match between England and Ghana in Boston, a final intervention by defender Ezri Konsa on the breaking Prince Adu led to discussion: should Ghana have been awarded a penalty? The moment, an emergency measure to prevent a major opportunity, put the arbitration decision under the magnifying glass.

What do referee and VAR pay attention to? - Place of contact: inside the box, a violation means a penalty kick; beyond that a direct free kick. - Nature of the intervention: was it careless, reckless or with excessive effort? And did the defender hit the ball first or mainly the man? - Intensity and consequence: limited contact or clearly hindering/undermining? Did the intervention materially influence the attack? - VAR protocol: the video referee only intervenes in the event of a “clear and obvious error” by the field referee in penalty situations.

![Image](https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/1024/cpsprodpb/f134/live/effc7d30-6f4e-11f1-8546-8f19e4fe30f4.jpg)

Arguments in favor of a penalty - If the defender hinders or brings down the attacker without playing the ball, this is punishable play. - Pulling or pushing movements that stop a breakthrough can be punishable if they clearly affect the attacker's running action or balance.

Arguments against a penalty - When the defender demonstrably plays the ball first and the subsequent contact is unavoidable or minimal, a referee will often continue play or not award a penalty. - In the event of light contact or when the attacker seeks contact, the referee may decide that it is insufficient for a penalty kick.

Conclusion Without all the camera angles and the exact decision of the arbitration, this is a gray area moment that remains subject to discussion. The situation with Konsa and Adu in Boston illustrates how thin the line can be in penalty situations at a World Cup: the context, the intensity of the contact and the first ball action ultimately determine whether the ball hits the spot — or not.

---

## Related Articles

1. [Jurulatih Ghana Pertikai Keputusan VAR Selepas Perlawanan Dengan England](https://harimaugoal.com/ms/news/jurulatih-ghana-pertikai-keputusan-var-selepas-perlawanan-dengan-england) 2. [Mundial 2026](https://azkalsgoal.com/fil/news/di-maria-hanga-sa-dalawang-gol-ni-messi-na-nagdala-sa-argentina-sa-susunod-na-yugto-ng-world-cup-2026)

Gerelateerde artikelen

World Cup 2026: Should Ghana have been awarded a penalty against England? | oranjenet.live | Oranje Total Football